【中危】OliveTin 安全更新(GHSA-prj9-97mp-mwh2)
安全情报快照 · 风险级别:中危 · CVSS:4.3 · CVE-2026-53541 · GHSA-prj9-97mp-mwh2
先看结论
OliveTin存在安全风险,< 0.0.0-20260531214440-ebffd9f040f7 受影响,建议升级至 0.0.0-20260531214440-ebffd9f040f7。
影响范围
| 生态 | 组件 | 受影响版本 | 首个修复版本 |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin |
< 0.0.0-20260531214440-ebffd9f040f7 | 0.0.0-20260531214440-ebffd9f040f7 |
处置建议
优先将 github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin 升级至 0.0.0-20260531214440-ebffd9f040f7 或更高版本;升级前请结合业务依赖完成兼容性验证。
上游技术详情(原文)
Description
The filterToDefinedArgumentsOnly function in the executor is intended to discard any arguments not explicitly defined in the action's configuration. However, a special case allows any argument whose name starts with ot_ to bypass this filter. While two system arguments (ot_executionTrackingId and ot_username) are injected by OliveTin and overridden, all other ot_-prefixed arguments supplied by the user pass through unmodified.
These bypassed arguments are:
- Not type-checked — the validation loop only iterates over the action's defined arguments, so
ot_-prefixed arguments skip all type safety checks entirely. - Set as environment variables — via
buildEnv(), with completely unvalidated values, and passed to the executed command. - Included in the template context — available as
.Arguments.ot_*in template rendering.
Affected Code
Filter bypass — service/internal/executor/executor.go (lines 728–731):
func keepArgument(name string, definedNames map[string]struct{}) bool {
_, ok := definedNames[name]
return ok || strings.HasPrefix(name, "ot_")
}
System args only override two keys — service/internal/executor/executor.go (lines 742–745):
func injectSystemArgs(req *ExecutionRequest) {
req.Arguments["ot_executionTrackingId"] = req.TrackingID
req.Arguments["ot_username"] = req.AuthenticatedUser.Username
}
Any other ot_-prefixed argument (e.g., ot_malicious) survives both functions.
Unvalidated values become environment variables — service/internal/executor/executor.go (lines 867–882):
func buildEnv(args map[string]string) []string {
ret := append(os.Environ(), "OLIVETIN=1")
for k, v := range args {
varName := fmt.Sprintf("%v", strings.TrimSpace(strings.ToUpper(k)))
if varName == "" { continue }
ret = append(ret, fmt.Sprintf("%v=%v", varName, v))
}
return ret
}
The value v is never validated. It can contain newlines, shell metacharacters, null bytes, or any arbitrary data.
Proof of Concept
An attacker sends a StartAction request with extra ot_-prefixed arguments:
{
"bindingId": "<any-action-id>",
"arguments": [
{ "name": "ot_custom_var", "value": "arbitrary unvalidated content \n with newlines" },
{ "name": "ot_another", "value": "$(whoami)" }
]
}
These arguments:
- Pass through
filterToDefinedArgumentsOnly(theot_prefix exempts them). - Are never type-checked (not in the action's argument definitions).
- Become environment variables
OT_CUSTOM_VARandOT_ANOTHERin the executed command's environment. - Are available in the template rendering context as
.Arguments.ot_custom_varand.Arguments.ot_another.
Impact
- Environment variable pollution — attacker can set arbitrary environment variables (with
OT_uppercased prefix) in the execution environment of any action they can trigger. Scripts or programs that read custom environment variables could be influenced. - Potential for secondary exploitation — if any executed script or command reads
OT_-prefixed environment variables, the unvalidated content could cause unexpected behavior. - Template context pollution — although Go's
text/templatedoes not recursively evaluate data values (mitigating direct template injection), the extra arguments are accessible in the template context and could interact unexpectedly with custom template logic.
Suggested Fix
Remove the ot_ prefix exception from keepArgument, or restrict it to only the two known system arguments:
var systemArgs = map[string]struct{}{
"ot_executionTrackingId": {},
"ot_username": {},
}
func keepArgument(name string, definedNames map[string]struct{}) bool {
_, isDefined := definedNames[name]
_, isSystem := systemArgs[name]
return isDefined || isSystem
}
Discovery Methodology
Both vulnerabilities were identified through manual source code review of the OliveTin repository, focusing on:
- Input validation boundaries (API request fields flowing into file system operations and execution contexts)
- Argument filtering and type-checking logic in the executor
- File path construction in the log persistence feature
No automated scanners or fuzzing tools were used. The review was conducted against the current main branch source code.
来源与许可
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-prj9-97mp-mwh2
- https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/security/advisories/GHSA-prj9-97mp-mwh2
- https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/commit/ebffd9f040f791208aee1db2e5a8aecd1e3e603d
本页自动同步 GitHub Advisory Database 的公开数据,并保留上游原文供核验;不宣称原创分析。数据许可:CC-BY-4.0。
评论
登录 后参与讨论。
还没有评论,来说两句。